Does the anti-war crowd lose credibility when they deny that gains have been made on the ground in Iraq?

While it is true that we have to wait to see if the reduction in violence is sustained after we start withdrawing troops, does the fact that many liberals deny ANY improvements have been made lead to a loss of their credibility?

Absolutely they lose credibility…It is obvious that significant progress has been made in a very short period of time. It just proves that their motivation is based solely on their misguided personal opinion of The President or a clouded perception of how serious these terrorists are. It’s embarrassing to me that the aggressive liberal campaign to smear the credibility of the Bush Administration has actually worked to some degree. It says to me that our society has a difficult time forming their own opinions from anything but spoon-fed liberal compost.
President Bush made the ultimate decision to wage war on terror but bravely did so with compelling evidence. Evidence fully endorsed by the US Congress. An ounce of prevention in this case will cost us billions of $’s but just think of the mess we would have to clean up if we waited for terrorism to flourish and inspire more terror within their ranks. That being said, by the time the election rolls around, it will be painfully obvious to the libs that the war is making significant progress. They will have to find something else to lie about to this gullible growing demographic in America.

Allen Iverson 41pts Break Kobe’s Ankle vs Shaq Lakers 98/99

Comments are closed